User agent detail

SonyEricssonU1iv/R2AA; Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.4; U; Series60/5.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/525 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Safari/525

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
SEMC SymbianOS SonyEricssonU1ivMobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Nokia Browser 7.0WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 5.0Sony EricssonSatiofeature phoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.0close closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.0closeSymbian OS 9.4SonyEricssonU1ivcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 525Series60 5.0Sony EricssonSatiomobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.4SonyEricssonU1ivFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:49 | by ThaDafinser