User agent detail

LG-LG620G[TF012114009741104000000018032359160] Obigo/WAP2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1

Detected by 6 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-LG620G closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Obigo WAP2 LG620Gsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 2.0close LG620Gcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Obigo WAP 2.0 LGLG620Gmobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGLG-LG620GFeature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:49 | by ThaDafinser