User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; HM NOTE 1LTEW Build/KVT49L) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/30.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36 MxBrowser/4.3.6.2000

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Maxthon 4.3Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Maxthon 4.3WebKit Android 4.4XiaomiHM Note 1LTEWphabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 30.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2XiaoMiHM NOTE 1LTEWcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Maxthon 4.3.6.2000Blink 537.36Android 4.4.2XiaomiRedmi Note 1mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.4closeAndroid 4.4XiaomiHM NOTE 1LTEWSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:55 | by ThaDafinser