User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; LG-E475f Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.166 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 33.0Blink Android 4.1LGE475fsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.1.2LGE475fcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 33Blink 537.36Android 4.1.2LGOptimus L1 II Trimobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 33closeAndroid 4.1LGE475fFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:56 | by ThaDafinser