User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; QS1023H Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.138 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.138closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.13QQS1023Htabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.138closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.1.2QS1023Hcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 35Blink 537.36Android 4.1.23QQoo! Surf Tablet QS1023Htabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.138closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:59 | by ThaDafinser