User agent detail

Nokia6303iclassic/5.0 (06.61) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/420 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/420

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Nokia Browser JAVA Nokia6303i classicMobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian Nokia6303iclassicsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 5.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia6303iclassiccloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 420Series40 Nokia6303i classicmobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia6303i classicFeature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:01 | by ThaDafinser