User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu Chromium/45.0.2454.7 Chrome/45.0.2454.7 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chromium 45.0Blink Ubuntu Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chromium 45.0Blink Ubuntu desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.7closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 45.0.2454closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chromium 45.0.2454.7Blink 537.36Ubuntu desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.7closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 45.0.2454.101closeFedora Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:01 | by ThaDafinser