User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.2;U; Series60/5.0 SonyEricssonU8i/1.00;Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/ CLDC-1.1)AppleWebKit/525 (KHTML, like Gecko) version/3.0Safari/525

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 3.0Safaricloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Nokia Browser 7.0WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 5.0Sony EricssonVivaz profeature phoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.0Safariclose closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.0closeSymbian OS 9.2SonyEricssonU8icloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 525Series60 5.0Sony EricssonVivaz Promobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.2SonyEricssonP1iFeature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:01 | by ThaDafinser