User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (MotorolaWebKit; U; /Windows CE 5.2) AppleWebKit/534.51 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/2.2.8.8 Mobile Safari/534.51

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 2.2.8.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Mobile Safari 2.2WebKit Windows CE MotorolarolaWebKitsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 2.2.8.8closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 2.2.8closeWindows CE closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Motorola WebKit Webkit 534.51Windows CE 5.2mobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 2.2.8.8closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile MotorolaEvokeFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:02 | by ThaDafinser