User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DTV) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Espial/6.1.12 AQUOSBrowser/1.0 (AS00DTV;V;0001;0001)AQUOS-AS/2.0 LC-60LX959H

Detected by 5 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 531.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Espial TV Browser 6.1WebKit SharpLC-60LX959Htv Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Espial 6.1.12close closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Espial 6.1.12Webkit 531.2 SharpLX959H Aquos TVtelevisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:02 | by ThaDafinser