User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS i686 1193.117.0) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/16.0.912.66 Safari/535.7

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 16.0WebKit ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 16.0.912.66closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 16.0WebKit Chrome OS 1193.117desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 16.0.912.66closeChrome OS 16.0.912.66closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 16.0.912closeChrome OS 1193.117.0closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 16Webkit 535.7Chrome OS desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 16.0.912.66closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 16.0.912.77closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:02 | by ThaDafinser