User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; de-de; KFOT Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.10 Safari/535.19 Silk-Accelerated=true

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Silk 3.10WebKit Android AmazonKindle Fire 7Tabletyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Mobile Silk 3.10Blink Android AmazonKindle Firetabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.10closeAndroid AmazonKindle Firecloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Silk 3.10Webkit 535.19FireOS 2AmazonKindle Firetabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 3.1closeAndroid AmazonKFOTTabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:02 | by ThaDafinser