User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 5_1_1 like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/534.46.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) CriOS/19.0.1084.60 Mobile/9B206 Safari/7534.48.3

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 19.0WebKit iOS 5.1AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 19.0.1084.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile iOS 19.0WebKit iOS 5.1AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 19.0.1084.60closeiOS 5.1.1closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile iOS 19.0.1084closeiOS 5.1.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 19Webkit 534.46.0iOS 5.1.1AppleiPhonemobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 19.0.1084.60closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS 5.0AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:03 | by ThaDafinser