User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-i8000/1.0 (Windows CE; Opera Mobi; U; xx) Opera 9.5

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 9.5Presto 2.2 SamsungGT-I8000Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Mobicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 9.5Presto Windows CE SamsungOmnia IIsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mobi;closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 9.5closeWindows CE SamsungGT-i8000closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Mobile Windows Mobile SamsungI8000 Omnia IImobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.5closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile SamsungGT i8000Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:03 | by ThaDafinser