User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.4; zh-cn; VIV-vivo Y913/PD1304CV_A_1.18.2; 854*480; CTC/2.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML,like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.4VivoVivo Y913smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.4.4closeAndroid 4.4.4closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Android Browser Webkit 537.36Android 4.4.4VivoY913mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:09 | by ThaDafinser