User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (New Nintendo 3DS like iPhone) AppleWebKit/536.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) NX/3.0.0.5.8 Mobile NintendoBrowser/1.0.9934.JP

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NintendoBrowser 1.0.9934.JPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
NetFront WebKit iOS Nintendo3DSconsoleyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront NX 3.0.0close closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
NetFront NX 3.0Webkit 536.30 NintendoNew 3DSgaming:portableyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS AppleiPhoneFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:10 | by ThaDafinser