User agent detail

MOT-A1200r/1.0 LinuxOS/2.4.20 Release/8.22.2006 Browser/Opera8.00 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Software/R541_G_11.52.13R

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 8.00Presto 2.2Linux Smartphone OS Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-A1200r 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
MotorolaA1200rsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera MIDP-2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux MotorolaA1200rcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Mobile 8.00 EZX Linux MotorolaA1200rmobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet closeLinux MotorolaA1200Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:10 | by ThaDafinser