User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.0.2; SAMSUNG SM-T350 Build/LRX22G) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) SamsungBrowser/3.2 Chrome/38.0.2125.102 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Samsung Browser 3.2Blink Android 5.0SamsungGalaxy Tab A 8.0Tabletyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 5.0SamsungSM-T350tabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 5.0.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 38.0.2125closeAndroid 5.0.2SamsungSM-T350closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Samsung Browser 3.2Blink 537.36Android 5.0.2SamsungGalaxy Tab A 8.0tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Samsung Browser 3.2closeAndroid 5.0SamsungSM-T350Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:10 | by ThaDafinser