User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SAMSUNG; SAMSUNG-GT-i9500/2.0; U; Tizen/2.0 like Android; xx) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) SLP Browser/2.0 Mobile

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.46closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Tizen Browser 2.0WebKit Tizen 2.0SamsungGT-i9500smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Tizen Browser 2.0closeTizen 2.0SamsungSAMSUNG-GT-i9500closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Samsung Browser Webkit 534.46Tizen 2.0SamsungGT-I9500 prototypemobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 3.0closeLinux TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:11 | by ThaDafinser