User agent detail

HbbTV/1.1.1 (NETRANGEMMH sraf_tv_browser webkitMozilla/5.0 (Unknown; Linux mips) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/19.77.34.5 Safari/537.36) FXM-U2FsdGVkX1/tdIdmThx556OcX2OvLYJ7xZ4szfWJhVJaKuyMPSh2dCfn+cBdncw9-END

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 19.77.34.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 19.77WebKit GNU/Linux SonyKDL40HX750tv Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 19.77.34.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux HbbTVcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Sraf TV Browser Webkit 537.36 televisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 19.77.34.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:13 | by ThaDafinser