User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.4.9999.1900 Safari/537.31 BDSpark/26.4

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 26.0WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 26.4.9999.1900closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Baidu Spark 26.4WebKit Windows 7desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 26.4.9999.1900closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 26.4.9999closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Baidu Spark 26.4Webkit 537.31Windows 7desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 26.4.9999.1900closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 26.0.1400.0closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:13 | by ThaDafinser