User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; Primo S3 mini Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.107 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/29.0.1809.91837

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 29.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 29.0.1809.91837closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera Mobile 29.0Blink Android 4.4WaltonPrimo S3 minismartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 29.0.1809.91837closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 29.0.1809closeAndroid 4.4.2WaltonPrimo S3 minicloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Mobile 29.0Blink 537.36Android 4.4.2WaltonPrimo S3 minimobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 29.0.1809.91837closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:14 | by ThaDafinser