User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; en-us; KFJWI Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/2.2 Mobile Safari/535.19 Silk-Accelerated=true

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Silk 2.2WebKit Android AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9 Wi-FiTabletyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Mobile Silk 2.2Blink Android 4.0AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9" WiFitabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 2.2closeAndroid 4.0.4AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9" WiFicloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Silk 2.2Webkit 535.19FireOS AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9"tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 2.2closeAndroid 4.0AmazonKFJWITabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:14 | by ThaDafinser