User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; LT26i Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Mobile Safari/535.19

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0SonyEricssonXperia Arc HDMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 18.0WebKit Android 4.0SonyXperia Ssmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.0.3SonyEricssonLT26icloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.0.3SonyXperia Smobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.0SonyEricssonLT26iSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:14 | by ThaDafinser