User agent detail

Opera/9.5 (Windows NT 5.1; U; xx) SAMSUNG-GT-i8000

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 9.5Presto Windows XPSamsungOmnia IIsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.5closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.5closeWindows XP SamsungGT-i8000closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Mobile 9.5 Windows Mobile SamsungI8000 Omnia IImobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 9.5closeWindows XPSamsungGT i8000Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:15 | by ThaDafinser