User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; ru; Desktop) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.2.0.336

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 9.2WebKit WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 9.2WebKit Windows Vistadesktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.0closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 9.2 mobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:15 | by ThaDafinser