User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1; M571C Build/LMY47D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/40.0.2214.114 Mobile Safari/537.36 LieBaoFast/3.17.4

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 40.0Blink Android 5.1MeizuM2 Notephabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.114closeAndroid 5.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 40.0.2214closeAndroid 5.1M571Ccloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
LieBaoFast 3.17.4Blink 537.36Android 5.1MeizuM2 Notemobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 40closeAndroid 5.1MeizuM571CSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:17 | by ThaDafinser