User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; en-us ; Karbonn A50 Build/MocorDroid2.3.5) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1/UCBrowser/8.5.3.246/145/33756

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 8.5WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 8.5WebKit MocorDroid 2.3KarbonnA50smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.5.3closeAndroid 2.3.6KarbonnA50closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 8.5Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6KarbonnA50mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:17 | by ThaDafinser