User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 2.3.4; Motorola-F100 Build/4.5.1-26_G2-436_US-MR7-24) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.45 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/15.0.1162.59192

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 15.0Blink Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 15.0.1162.59192closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera Mobile 15.0Blink Android 2.3MotorolaF100smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 15.0.1162.59192closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 15.0.1162closeAndroid 2.3.4MotorolaF100closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera 15.0Blink 537.36Android 2.3.4MotorolaMOTOACTVwatchyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 15.0.1162.59192closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:17 | by ThaDafinser