User agent detail

Opera/30.0.1835.59 (X11; Linux i686; Ubuntu/14.10) Presto/2.12.388 Version/29.16 AppleWebKit/599.0+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.118 Safari/537.36 FAST-WebCrawler/3.8

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 3 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 29.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
yesBot Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 30.0.1835.59closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesFAST-WebCrawlerclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
closeyesFAST Web Crawlerclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.118closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:22 | by ThaDafinser