User agent detail

ELinks/0.10.4-7-debian (textmode; Linux 2.6.14 i686; 110x48-2)

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
ELinks 0.10 Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ELinks 0.10.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Elinks 0.10Text-based GNU/Linux desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
ELinks 0.10closeDebian closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
ELinks 0.10.4 Linux desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:23 | by ThaDafinser