User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/45.0.2454.85 Safari/537.36 OPR/32.0.1948.25

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 45.0Blink MacOSX 10.11AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 32.0.1948.25closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 32.0Blink Mac 10.11desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 32.0.1948.25closeOS X 10.11.0closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 32.0.1948closeMac OS X 10.11.0closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera 32.0Blink 537.36OS X El Capitan 10.11desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 32.0.1948.25closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 4.0closeWindows 98 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:24 | by ThaDafinser