User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (Compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) SonyEricssonM1i/R1AA Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1; Windows Phone 6.5

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
IE 6.0Trident WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Phone 6.5Sony EricssonAspensmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows XPcloseWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeWindows Phone 6.5SonyEricssonM1icloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows Mobile 6.5Sony EricssonAspenmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet closeWindows Phone 6.5SonyEricssonM1iFeature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:25 | by ThaDafinser