User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 4.1.2; en-US; GT-S5282) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.2.0.242 U2/1.0.0 Mobile

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 8.2U2 Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 8.2 Android 4.1SamsungGT-S5282smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.0closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungGT-S5282closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 8.2Gecko Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Starmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.1SamsungGT-S5282Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:26 | by ThaDafinser