User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS i686 1828.0.2012) AppleWebKit/535.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/19.0.1051.0 Safari/535.22

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 19.0WebKit ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 19.0.1051.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 19.0WebKit Chrome OS 1828.0desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 19.0.1051.0closeChrome OS 19.0.1051.0closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 19.0.1051closeChrome OS 1828.0.2012closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome Dev 19.0.1051.0Webkit 535.22Chrome OS desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 19.0.1051.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 19.0.1031.0closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:26 | by ThaDafinser