User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.89 Vivaldi/1.0.83.38 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Vivaldi 1.0Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Vivaldi 1.0.83.38closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Vivaldi 1.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Vivaldi 1.0.83.38closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Vivaldi 1.0.83closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Vivaldi 1.0Blink 537.36Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:26 | by ThaDafinser