User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.77 Large Screen Safari/534.24 GoogleTV/b61925

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 11.0WebKit Linux GoogleGoogleTVTV Device Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 11.0WebKit Google TV GoogleGoogleTVtvyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 11.0.696closeGoogleTV GoogleTVcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 11Webkit 534.24Google TV televisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeLinux i686 LogitechRevueSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:26 | by ThaDafinser