User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; ARCHOS 101G9 Build/MR1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.123 Safari/537.22

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.0Archos101 G9Tabletyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.123closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.0Archos101G9tabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.123closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 25.0.1364closeAndroid 4.0.3Archos101G9closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 25Webkit 537.22Android 4.0.3Archos101 G9tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.123closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 25closeAndroid 4.0Archos101 G9Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:26 | by ThaDafinser