User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.4; xx; Baidu Yi on Passion Build/GRJ22) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/8.8.1.258 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 8.8WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 8.8WebKit Android 2.3yes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.8.1closeAndroid 2.3.4Baidu Yi on Passioncloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 8.8Webkit 534.31Baidu Yi HTCNexus Onemobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:29 | by ThaDafinser