User agent detail

Mozilla/3.0 (DDIPOCKET;JRC/AH-J3001V,AH-J3002V/1.0/0100/c50) CNF/2.0

Detected by 4 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Pocket Internet Explorer 3.0 (DDIPOCKET;JRCclose closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
CNF 2.0 JRCAH-J3001Vmobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
WILLCOM AH-J3001V,AH-J3002Vcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Japan Radio CompanyWX330JFeature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:30 | by ThaDafinser