User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 3.1; zh-tw; AT100 Build/HMJ37) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.13

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 3.1ToshibaAT100Tabletyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 3.1ToshibaRegza AT100tabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 3.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 3.1closeAndroid 3.1ToshibaAT100closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Android Browser Webkit 534.13Android 3.1ToshibaRegza AT100tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 3.1closeAndroid 3.1ToshibaAT100Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:31 | by ThaDafinser