User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Slackware/Chrome/12.0.742.100 Safari/534.30

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 12.0.742.100closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 12.0WebKit Slackware desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 12.0.742.100closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 12.0.742closeSlackware closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 12Webkit 534.30Slackware desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 12.0.742.100closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:32 | by ThaDafinser