User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; LC0810C Build/IMM76I) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.92 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.92closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.03QLC0810Ctabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.92closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 30.0.1599closeAndroid 4.0.43QLC0810Ccloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 30Blink 537.36Android 4.0.43QQoo! Q-Pad LC0810Ctabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.92closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:35 | by ThaDafinser