User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.4; Series60/5.0 NokiaN97-5/30.2.004; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/525

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Safari SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 525closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Nokia Browser 7.0WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 5.0NokiaN97smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 30.2.004;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.0closeSymbian OS 9.4NokiaN97-5closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 533.4Series60 5.0NokiaN97 Minimobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.4NokiaN97 miniFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:35 | by ThaDafinser