User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; TR10CS1 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.122 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.2ECSTR10CS1tabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.2.2TR10CS1closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 35Blink 537.36Android 4.2.2ECSTR10CS1tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 35closeAndroid 4.2IntelECS TR10CS1Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:38 | by ThaDafinser