User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; Woxter Tablet PC 76CXi Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1212.65583

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1212.65583closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.0WoxterTablet PC 76CXitabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1212.65583closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 16.0.1212closeAndroid 4.0.4WoxterTablet PC 76CXicloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera 16.0Blink 537.36Android 4.0.4WoxterTablet PC 76 CXitabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1212.65583closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:38 | by ThaDafinser