User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows Phone OS 8.10.14203.0; Trident/5.0; IEMobile/9.0; CuteBrowser/3.0.0; SAMSUNG; GT-I8750)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
IEMobile 9.0Trident 5.0WinPhone Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
IE Mobile 9.0Trident Windows Phone 8.10SamsungGT-I8750smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows Phone closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows Phone 8.10SamsungGT-I8750closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
CuteBrowser 3.0Trident 5.0Windows Phone 8.10SamsungAtiv Smobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows Phone 8.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:39 | by ThaDafinser