User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_1_6 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/10B500 [FBAN/FBIOS;FBAV/9.0.0.25.31;FBBV/2102024;FBDV/iPhone2,1;FBMD/iPhone;FBSN/iPhone OS;FBSV/6.1.6;FBSS/1; FBCR/BouyguesTelecom;FBID/phone;FBLC/fr_FR;

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Facebook App WebKit iOS 6.1AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 536.26closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 6.1AppleiPhone 3GSsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 6.1.6closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Facebook 9.0.0closeiOS 6.1.6AppleiPhone2,1closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Facebook Webkit 536.26iOS 6.1.6AppleiPhone 3GSmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
FaceBook on iOS 6.1.6closeiOS 6.1.6AppleiPhone 3GSSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:39 | by ThaDafinser