User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US) AppleWebKit/530.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/2.0.172.0 Safari/530.4

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 2.0WebKit WinXP 5.2Desktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 2.0.172.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 2.0WebKit Windows Server 2003desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 2.0.172.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 2.0.172closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 2Webkit 530.4Windows Server 2003desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 2.0.172.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 2.0.156.1closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:41 | by ThaDafinser