User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (LG-T395 AppleWebkit/531 Browser/Phantom/V2.0 Widget/LGMW/3.0 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) UNTRUSTED/1.0

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Phantom Browser 2.0WebKit JAVA Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebkit 531closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Java LGT395smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Phantom Browser 2.0close LGT395closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Phantom 2.0Webkit 531 LGT395mobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close J2ME MidletFeature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:42 | by ThaDafinser